The course is divided into three parts. 1. Introduction to ethics in general and social ethics through the study of the major contemporary currents. The idea of ethical competence. 2. Social Justice and Iiequalities. 3. Corporate Social Responsibility (Expert Curriculum in Training Processes) ; the Uncertainty and the social security (Social Security Curriculum)
Knowledge: Applied ethics and ethics; The ethical relationship - deontology, contemporary social ethics;inequalities and social justice; Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR ); stakeholder theory (curriculum Expert in Educational Processes). Uncertainty, social insecurity and citizenship (Social Security Curriculum) Abilities: Context analysis ability according to ethical criteria (for all curricula); educational processes in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR); ability to analyze ethical codes, social balance sheets and other CSR "tools" (curriculum Expert in Educational Processes). Ability to analyze ethical emergencies related to uncertainty, social security, citizen's exercise (Social Security Curriculum)
Competencies: implementation and development of ethical competence as a fundamental core competency for the educator; development of the relational dimension listening and analysis of needs based; analysis and resolution of moral dilemmas emerging in the educational process and in the profession of educator ((curriculum Expert in Educational Processes).Planning of ethically sustainable interventions in the field of social security (Social Security Curriculum)
1. Lectures, at the beginning of the course, aimed at providing the conceptual tools, key words and expressions 2. Interactive lessons based on students' questions and request. it is, also, provided lessons peer to peer The lectures will be supported with the use of slides, films, testimonies that will be published in aulaweb
1. Introduction to social ethics: definition of ethics, ethics and applied ethics, ethics and deontology, social ethics and public ethics 2. Social justice and inequality: fair and unjust inequalities, relationship between social justice, development, inequalities, individual responsibility; justice and globalization 3. Education and business ethics; Social uncertainty and citizenship rights
B. Giovanola (ed), Etica pubblica, giustizia sociale, diseguaglianze, Carocci, Roma, 2016
S. Zamagni, Impresa responsabile e mercato civile, Il Mulino, Bologna, 2013 (curriculum Expert in Educational Processes()
R. Castel, Incertezze crescenti. Lavoro, cittadinanza, individuo, Editrice Socialmente, Bologna 2015
The students not attending the lessons, must integrate the program with:
L. Morri, Etica e società nel mondo contemporaneo, Franco Angeli, Milano, 2004 (chapter I)
Ricevimento: Genoa Thursday from 11:30 am to 1:30 pm D.A.FI.ST, v. Balbi, 2 - 3rd floor Tel .: 010 209 5859; 010 209 51463 Savona Friday from 1 pm to 2 pm Professors Room Palazzina Lagorio University Campus, 2 v. Magliotto
FRANCO MANTI (President)
NATASHA COLA
ARIANNA DI GIUSEPPE
LUCIA ROGGERONI
Wednesday, September 28, 2016 - 14 pm
Oral Examination intends to verify knowledge, abilities and competencies acquired by students
The exam is divided into two phases:
1. Test on the book Per una formazione Umanistica 2.Test on the book Codici Etici; test on the additional book for not attending students
Inside of both phases is provide for discussion of ethically significant case studies The students must obtain a score of at least 18/30 in each of the two phases
Test of Social Ethics
Oral test evaluation grid
Descriptors
Scoring range
Score
Case studies discussion
(max 7 points)
Uncertain arguments, poor elaboration
1-2
Essential arguments and correct exposition
3-4
Adequate and significant arguments
5-6
Original, thorough and very significant arguments
7
Contents discussion
(max 23 points)
Knowledge
(max 10 points)
Incomplete and /or fragmentary
1-3
Generic
4-5
Essential
6
Organic with improvements
7-8
Complete and organized with improvements
9-10
Skills
Argumentation and use of a language not always appropriate
Sufficient argumentation and use of a specific language
4
Good argumentation and clarity
5
Excellent argumentation and clarity
6 - 7
Competences
(max 6 points)
Inadequate connections and lack of consequential logic
Sufficient links and appropriate consequential logic
Good ability to link and consequential logic
5- 6
Total score
30/30
Top mark Proposal
X
