This course aims to analyse and critically discuss the interplay between methodological assumptions and normative implications in contemporary political theories. At the intersection between theory, practice and political methodology, the course aims to assess the plausibility of practical and theoretical implications of the most relevant models in normative political theory.
Normative political theory deals with matters of justice that have a distinctively collective nature. At the intersection between different disciplines (political philosophy, political theory and ethics), normative political theory addresses both substantive topics (multiculturalism, pluralism, toleration, animal and environmental ethics, international justice), as well as methodological issues (public justification, realism and idealism in political theory, and so on). Normative political theory seeks to investigate practical problems employing the conceptual resources of political philosophy and/or of other disciplines.
This course aims to provide students with the necessary conceptual tools to better understand the relation between methodological and normative issues in contemporary political theories. At the end of the course, students
The first section of the first module will consist of lectures in order to introduce the basic conceptual apparatus. The other sections and the second module will include also seminars. Depending on the students’ availability, each section will be concluded by a seminar in which the students will present and critically discuss a possible solution to the problems raised by the course.
The course will be given online, on Teams, code: kjinfuu
The design of this course follows a “Problem Based Learning” (PBL) methodology. Specifically, it seeks to address the practical and theoretical problem of implementing the demands of justice. How could normative theories of justice improve their capacity to be put in practice? And, what can the role of political theories be? These questions inhabit the whole history of political philosophy, in particular the opposition between idealism and realism, and are still present in contemporary debates. These are the questions at the centre of the two modules of the course (40 hours 6CFU the first, 20 hours 3CFU, the second).
The first module will be organized in different sub-sections, each of which will address the following questions:
For each sub-section, the students will be provided with a conceptual apparatus (for instance, concerning the merits and limits of realist or idealist approaches). At the end of all sub-sections there will be a student seminar.
The second module of the course will guide students through the different functions of political theories (prescriptive, evaluative, critical, genealogical). In this way, students will see how some fundamental distinctions (ideal vs. nonideal, realism vs. normativitism, feasibility vs. desirability) are translated into contemporary philosophical debates. Specifically, the comparison between different theories will raise awareness of contemporary disputes about justice between ideal and non-ideal theory (Rawls, Honneth, and Fraser), the problem of political transformation between desirability and feasibility, and debates about truth in politics between moralism and realism.
6 CFU
Besussi, A., Biale, E. (a cura di) (2010), Fatti e principi. Una disputa sulla giustizia, Roma, Aracne, 2010. (capp. 1-3, pp. 14-90)
Burelli, C. (2020), Realtà, necessità, conflitto: il realismo in filosofia politica, Roma, Carocci
Southwood, N. (2018), “The feasibility issue”, Philosophy compass 13, pp. 1-13
Valentini, L. (2012), “Ideal vs. Non-Ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map”, Philosophy Compass 7/9, pp. 654-664.
Williams, B. (2005), In the beginning was the deed. Realism and moralism in political argument (Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press). (cap. 1)
Zuolo, F. (2016), “La realizzabilità e l’efficacia nella teoria politica antica”, Ragion pratica 46, pp. 115-135
Students must also
9 CFU
Students who do not attend to the course should either discuss the following texts at the oral exam or write a short essay (max 10 pages, to be sent at least 7 days before the exam)
N. Fraser e A. Honneth, Redistribuzione o riconoscimento?: una controversia politico-filosofica, Meltemi, Roma, primo saggio di Fraser e primo saggio di Honneth.
J. Rawls, Giustizia come equità, Feltrinelli, Milano, parte I, parte II.
Ricevimento: On Teams platform. The students should write an email to arrange a meeting with the teachers.
FEDERICO ZUOLO (President)
CORRADO FUMAGALLI
VALERIA OTTONELLI (Substitute)
MARIA SILVIA VACCAREZZA (Substitute)
21 September 2020.
NORMATIVE POLITICAL THEORY
Oral examination. In addition, the students will have to either write a paper or give a talk on a theme provided by the teachers. The oral examination will begin from a discussion of the paper or the seminar and then will touch on other course’s themes.
