LEARNING OUTCOMES

This course aims to provide students with an overview of classical and more recent linguistic studies on figurative language, and to investigate some applicative issues, with a special attention for translation.

AIMS AND LEARNING OUTCOMES

At the end of this course, the student will:

• Known the main classical and more recent linguistic approaches to metaphors and other figures
• Master the scientific terminology 
• Be able to independently investigate a topic of interest

PREREQUISITES

Basic knowledge of general linguistics.

Those without knowledge of general linguistics can refer to textbooks such as, among others:

• Berruto, G. e Cerruti, M. (2017). La linguistica. Un corso introduttivo. Torino: UTET.
• Strik Lievers, F. (2020). La linguistica e le lingue. Roma: Carocci

TEACHING METHODS

This course consists in lectures, in which students will be invited to actively participate (for instance by analyzing data and texts). Each student will also choose a topic that will be the object of oral presentation and discussion.

SYLLABUS/CONTENT

After an introduction to figurative language and an overview of figures of expression (rhythm, sound, etc.) and figures of content (metaphor, metonymy, oxymoron, etc.), we will focus on the latter, and especially on metaphors, which are not only common in literary texts, but are widespread in many other textual genres, as well as in our everyday language. Specific attention will be devoted to the theoretical and practical issues involved in the translation of metaphors. Moreover, we will investigate the role played by metaphors in fields such as advertising, politics, education, as well as in specialized language. The last part of the course is dedicated to the individual research conducted by the students (to be agreed with the lecturer). 

RECOMMENDED READING/BIBLIOGRAPHY

1) Prandi, M. & De Santis, C. (2019). La valorizzazione estetica della lingua: le figure. In M. Prandi & C. De Santis, Manuale di linguistica e di grammatica italiana, Torino: UTET, pp. 443-492.

2) Approx. 50 pages (students attending classes)/ Approx. 80 pages (students not attending classes) from the following studies (or from other studies discussed in class / to be agreed with the lecturer):

Akita, K. & M. Dingemanse. 2019. Ideophones (Mimetics, Expressives). In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford University Press. https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_3012530_5/component/file_3060417/co…

Black, M. 1955. Metaphor. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 55(1). 273–294.

Cardona, G. R. 1985. Iconicità e astrazione. In G. R. Cardona (a cura di), I sei lati del mondo. Linguaggio ed esperienza, Roma-Bari, Laterza.

Deignan, A. 2008. Corpus linguistics and metaphor. In R.W.Jr. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, 280–294. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ervas, F. & Gola, E. 2016. Che cos’è una metafora, Roma: Carocci.

Forceville, C. 2008. Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. In R.W.Jr. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, 462–482. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kövecses, Z. 2016. Conceptual metaphor theory. In E. Semino & Z. Demjén (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language, 31–45. New York: Routledge.

Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 2003. Metaphors we Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Miller, D.R. & E. Monti (eds.). 2014. Tradurre Figure / Translating Figurative Language. Bologna: Centro di Studi Linguistico-Culturali (CeSLiC). http://amsacta.unibo.it/4030/1/TradurreFigure_Volume_MillerMonti2014.pdf

Musolff, A. 2016. Metaphor and persuasion in politics. In E. Semino & Z. Demjén (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language, 309–322. New York: Routledge.

Pragglejaz Group. 2007. MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol22(1). 1–39.

Prandi, M. 2010. Typology of Metaphors: Implications for Translation. Mutatis Mutandis. Revista Latinoamericana de Traducción 3(2). 304–332.

Prandi, M. (2021). Le metafore tra le figure: una mappa ragionata. Torino: UTET. 

Rossi, M. 2016. Pour une typologie des avatars métaphoriques dans les terminologies spécialisées. Langue française189(1). 87.

Sapir, E. 1929. A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology 12(3). 225–239.

Semino, E. & G. Steen. 2008. Metaphor in literature. In R.W.Jr. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, 232–246. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shen, Y. 2008. Metaphor and poetic figures. In R.W.Jr. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, 295–308. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Strik Lievers, F. 2017. Figures and the senses: Towards a definition of synaesthesia. Review of Cognitive Linguistics15(1). 83–101.