The course focuses on the topic of underdetermination of meaning and contextual dependence. After introducing the basics of true-conditional semantics with the double index developed by David Kaplan for fragments of languages containing ondexical and demonstrative expressions, we will study the four main theoretical approaches that deal with contextual dependence: contextualism, indessicalism/conventionalism, minimalism, and semantic relativism.
The teaching assumes knowledge of basic logic and philosophy of language. The course in Philosophical Semantics is strongly discouraged for students who do not fulfil these requirement.
The course aims to introduce students to the debate on the divide between semantics and pragmatics. In particular, the topic of contextual dependence and the phenomenon of underdetermination of meaning will be explored, starting from the Gricean theory that defends the autonomy of semantics and places contextual dependence on the agenda of pragmatics, to arrive at the theories that philosophers have developed as alternatives to the Gricean approach: contextualism, indessicalism, minimalism, and relativism.
At the end of the course students will be able to master the main concepts that animate the debate between the philosophers of language on the demarcation between semantics and pragmatics. Students will acquire the necessary skills to face the independent study of essays on the philosophy of language and the study of topics that might be of interest for the writing of the degree thesis.
The course covers a cycle of lectures.
Program
Part 1
The semantics with double index: context of utterance and circumstance of evaluation
Part 2 Meaning, saying, and communicating Part 3 Context Dependence, semantics and pragmatics: contextualism, indexicalism, minimalism, relativism Part 4 Some objections against the Russellian theory of definite descriptions
Vignolo, M., e Frixione, M., 2018. Filosofia del Linguaggio, Milano: Mondadori.
Ricevimento: Monday, 1-3 PM, via Balbi 30, 7° floor
MASSIMILIANO VIGNOLO (President)
VALERIA OTTONELLI
MARCELLO FRIXIONE (Substitute)
Semptember 23
Monday, Tuesday, Friday 11 AM-1 PM
Room F, Balbi 4
Oral exam
Students will be assessed on the basis of (i) knowledge of the contents covered during the course, (ii) ability to analyze and reconstruct philosophical arguments, and (iii) appropriateness in the use of philosophical language.
